home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT2151>
- <title>
- Sep. 30, 1991: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Sep. 30, 1991 Curing Infertility
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 26
- THE POLITICAL INTEREST
- Nobody Does Nothing Better Than Shamir
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> "Israel has no foreign policy, only a defense policy."
- </p>
- <p>-- Moshe Dayan
- </p>
- <p> "Israel has no foreign policy, only a domestic political
- system."
- </p>
- <p>-- Henry Kissinger
- </p>
- <p> The historian Isaiah Berlin is reported to have said that
- Yitzhak Shamir is like a wall and that while walls have uses,
- being talked to is not one of them. Listening to Shamir,
- however, is revelatory. For in common with several other world
- leaders (Saddam Hussein comes quickly to mind), the Israeli
- Prime Minister has always said exactly what he thinks and more
- often than not has done exactly what he has said he was going
- to do.
- </p>
- <p> Several years ago, I asked Shamir about the Dayan and
- Kissinger observations. Both were correct, he said, admitting
- that his nation's obvious security needs and geography combined
- with an increasingly conservative politics to support his own
- heartfelt suspicion of the Arabs in Israel's midst. "But there
- is more," he added calmly. "You see, I just don't believe in
- trading land for peace. I mean I don't believe in it."
- </p>
- <p> Since then, and despite his willingness to attend the
- peace conference that James Baker has been trying to arrange,
- Shamir has not changed his mind. "It is not a religious notion
- for him," explains the Israeli philosopher David Hartman, "but
- rather a deeper commitment to a historical consciousness that
- says a vital people has been too long denied its rightful place
- on all of the land of Israel." What is politically significant,
- says Hartman, is that "the people trust Shamir to stick to his
- guns. They know he is not out to win a Man of the Year award,
- that he's not interested in having cocktails with the goyim. The
- polls say a majority would favor trading land for peace, but
- they know that if it is Shamir who cuts a deal, it will be
- because it is smart to do so, not simply expedient."
- </p>
- <p> A deal? Only dreamers still hope that the Prime Minister's
- hard line is a negotiating gambit. Realists know better. Most
- skulk away depressed. Some summon the courage to strike back,
- as George Bush is doing.
- </p>
- <p> For Shamir, a territorial compromise that could realize
- the hope of most Israelis to live in peace is not a dream at
- all, but a nightmare. "Peace for peace" is what Shamir wants,
- a pledge of Israeli cooperation with her poorer Arab neighbors
- in exchange for an end to the Arab boycott of corporations that
- do business with Israel. Beyond that, Shamir is perfectly
- satisfied with the status quo. To him, Israel appears blessed:
- Saddam is defanged, Syria has been humbled because its longtime
- patron, the Soviet Union, is consumed with its own problems, and
- the Palestinian intifadeh, while a nuisance, rarely intrudes on
- the daily lives of most Israelis.
- </p>
- <p> Understand Shamir's basic intransigence on the central
- question and you can appreciate why Israel precipitated the
- latest settlement dust-up. And make no mistake about it: it was
- Shamir, not Bush, who started it all--intentionally. "At some
- point, the Issue--we capitalize it--will really be joined,"
- says a Shamir adviser. "Whenever that time comes, the Prime
- Minister's `no' could kill the chance of U.S. aid in the
- settling of Soviet Jews. So we decided to try and get the money
- first. Given our underlying position, we reasoned it would be
- harder later, not easier."
- </p>
- <p> Buttressed by an assumption articulated long ago by
- Defense Minister Moshe Arens--"It doesn't matter who the
- President is as long as we have the Senate"--Shamir's American
- allies began their campaign. The conventional wisdom held that
- no American President would risk precious political capital by
- vetoing legislation supporting Israel. When Bush threatened just
- that, the Israelis were stuck. But even those who call Bush an
- anti-Semite must know that the President is merely anti-Shamir,
- or more properly that Bush is simply exercising an American
- prerogative to quarrel with another government's policies.
- </p>
- <p> Is there any way out? Creative diplomacy may resolve the
- instant crisis. Israel may get the absorption assistance it
- seeks in some form, at some time. But the Issue will linger, and
- if the logjam is to be broken, the burden of change should be
- borne equally by the other side. Too many wars have confirmed
- that the Arabs' hard line should be taken as seriously as
- Shamir's.
- </p>
- <p> Many Israelis buoyed by Yasser Arafat's seeming acceptance
- of their right to exist in December 1988 have had second
- thoughts. "Beyond everything," says the Israeli author Ze'ev
- Chafets, "beyond the continuation of terrorist actions, the
- Palestine Liberation Organization's refusal to amend its
- covenant [which calls for the destruction of Israel], the
- P.L.O.'s support for Iraq during the gulf war, and the
- insistence of West Bank Palestinians that their statements and
- actions be cleared by Arafat, there is a single image that will
- probably not recede for all of our lives. It was when we were
- all huddling with our gas masks hoping the Scuds wouldn't hit
- and the Palestinians were on their rooftops cheering. It will
- be a long time before anything the Arabs say is trusted."
- </p>
- <p> David Hartman, who has long favored a two-state solution,
- agrees. "Baker needs to spend less time trying to stop the
- settlements, which won't happen, and more time convincing the
- Palestinians that they must prove to us that they understand
- that we are home, that we are equally entitled to live here. If
- that ever happens, the hard-line ideologies will fade as
- controlling political forces, the settlements question will be
- resolved, and we will be as welcoming of the West Bank Arabs,
- and perhaps even of the P.L.O., as we were of Anwar Sadat."
- </p>
- <p> If and when Hartman's dream is realized, the Shamirs will
- be thanked for having helped to keep Israel together for almost a
- half-century of unending hostility, and then they will be
- retired. Until then, the rejectionists will rule--and half in
- frustration, half in admiration, Israelis will continue to say
- what they have said for years: Nobody does nothing better than
- Yitzhak Shamir.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-